60 Comments

My sense of this is, Biden and Trump are part of the Dog n Pony Show (it's fake dogs and fake ponies, tho-- nothing real about any of this!), to keep us focused on what the Nasties WANT us to focus on. They want us fighting with each other, Red or Blue? "RED!! BLUE!!! Damn you, RED!!!! NO, damn YOU, BLUE!!!!"

So we are looking elsewhere while they slowly chip away at our health, our wealth, our property, our food supply, our financial wherewithal, our energy wherewithal... and all the rest.

HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING, my peeps? THEY AIN'T DONE WITH US, not by a long shot.

Expand full comment

Do you think that the Dems are intentionally throwing the 2024 election to ambush Trump in 2025, the way the Brit leftists ambushed rightist Prime Minister Liz Truss?

If not, then what explains the inexplicably stupid thing the Dems did, such as hiding Biden's dementia and then doing something to make it obvious, something the Dems didn't have to, i.e. an early debate?

Expand full comment

I don't have ALL the answers. I see the bigger picture, which is that the US govt and power have been infiltrated, or turned, by and/or to, globalist "true believers" or whatever. These people may or may not be actual Americans. I suspect that they ARE, and they've been turned by money or promises of power positions, or both... I don't know details, I just know that the Globalists are not all Americans, they live in various countries, I think. But these Globalists are behind all the hell we've been going through and will continue to go through, until they're stopped. But you see the journalists, you see the doctors and nurses, you see the governmental players... ALL these people, they're being paid off to be traitors and murderers and misinformants... It's all a PLAN to eradicate most of the world's PEOPLE, and impose Tyranny, in a BIG WAY, coming slowly to a theater near you (anybody), and continuing, until they kill us all, or we put them down. I believe it will be the latter, but not until we have enough people who are AWARE of what is coming. That's my take.

Expand full comment

" I've been aware of Biden's dementia for years."

So has everyone else, including the people who were hiding it and the people they were supposedly hiding it from.

My question is, what were the Dem chiefs trying to accomplish by choosing to put it on display now? What were they trying to accomplish? To intentionally throw the election? If so, why?

There is a theory.

Expand full comment

Why, indeed. I am not privy to their bizarre behavior, but I suspect there IS a reason. What's the theory you allude to?

Expand full comment

The one in this post. That the Dems want Trump to win so that in 2025 they can cause a financial or other crisis and blame it on him. And impeach him and, with the help of RINWs convict him, villify him, and in so doing destroy MAGA once and for all. I.e. the theory that Mises reported is floating around and which, in fact, the Brit leftists used to destroy Liz Truss and end the populist threat there.

Expand full comment

Well, that's certainly possible, and the kind of stinky back-door kind of fuckery I'd expect, lol. But we're headed for either a financial crisis or a financial SOMETHING whatever we do... we've been well and truly screwed this way, by our central govt., which should be taken out and dumped. So saith the dog.

Expand full comment

Clinton, Gates, Pritzker, Rothschild, Windsor, Trudeau, Soros, Schwab and more.

Expand full comment

Yes, and LOTS more... Names we simply don't ever hear. The real Psycho Rats, the "Illuminati," the "Black Nobility"... They are the .001%, whose wealth is 90% of the world's wealth! They are not billionaires, but TRILLIONAIRES. Time for them to GO, since they are the eugenicists trying to kill us all off. Fie.

Expand full comment

Absolutely correct (IMHO).

Expand full comment

Hiding Biden's dementia is just another stupid thing... done out of arrogance... The Nasties think of us as "talking cows," dumb animals, and the slow movement of the HERD that is the stupefied public just makes them think it more so. It's pretty amazing how bold they are. AS IF NOBODY would notice??? I've been aware of Biden's dementia for years.

Expand full comment

Anyone that thinks Trump is going to sail into the Office of Presidency without resistance is a fool.

Expand full comment

Yes, what happened to Liz Truss in the UK should be a lesson to us all. That's why the media didn't report it much here.

Expand full comment

I'll tell you why the Dems would actually PREFER to be in power if markets were to crash: it would allow them to exponentially increase the number of people who would become permanently dependent on government benefits; with them doling out the ration coupons.

Their overarching goal is to turn this nation into a slightly more prosperous version of Venezuela or Cuba.

They want all but a few of us totally dependent on them, and for us to be treated like livestock. Like barnyard animals to be milked, shorn, and herded about at their will. In exchange for our meager rations of hay bales and oats, we will

eventually be sent to the slaughterhouse or put out to pasture when we're no longer of any use to them.

Expand full comment

Exactly. That is the left's plan, precisely.

"Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they. How did this change come about? ...view of Hobbes [that] ...the human species is divided into so many herds of cattle, each with its ruler, who keeps guard over them for the purpose of devouring them... As a shepherd the natural superior to the sheep of his flock, so the shepherds of men, i.e., their rulers, are naturally superior to the peoples under them."

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract (1762

Expand full comment

I wish more Americans were familiar with Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. We'd be a wiser nation for it.

Expand full comment

Interesting theory. They want to arrive at that conclusion one way or another.

Expand full comment

Yet, when the Dems were in power in the first 2 years of Biden's presidency, that didn't happen. Why not?

Expand full comment

The entire process unfolds over years, not days. Or weeks. That enables it to continue stealthily creeping forward, because its victims, the average American citizen whose once predictable life is torn out by the roots during times of crisis, get their first dose of the narcotic that is a government handout.

You'll recall The American Recovery Act.

The trillions of $$ that poured from the firehose of that law flowed everywhere in torrents. I know of people who actually quit their existing jobs to access that cash. They quit paying rent because they knew they could not be evicted. They got EBT cards. They applied for and were granted Medicaid. They CHOSE to climb into the hammock of what they thought might be a life of permanent leisure, for as long as it might last. It was stupendously short-sighted thinking. Just like those first heady days of drug addiction.

And with the predictable results: a slow but steady descent into dystopia.

When, and if, there is a crippling economic crash in 2025, the Socialist Democrats will mourn the lost opportunity to expand the welfare state if they do not hold the reins of government.

Expand full comment

"The entire process unfolds over years, not days. Or weeks. "

Yes. So far. But there is such a thing as a tipping point. The straw of government intervention that breaks the back of the private sector economy? I'm not saying "Apocalypse Now" but it seems there is real possibility of "Apocalypse 2025."

If a huge financial crisis is precipitated in 2025, the U.S. government will almost certainly fire up the CBDC plan that the Fed really has been developing, to distribute "stimulus" money.

I don't think it's fear-mongering to claim that a CBDC would be the doorway to ending the private sector economy and replacing it with a government controlled command economy. It’s not an eschatological fantasy. That transition has been done many times in other nations.

Expand full comment

The alternative to war, big war, and don't think they wouldn't do it!

They are desperate, and it is an effective strategy (which has been done before).

But, this assumes Trump is not in their game of globalism and power (debatable).

This assumes there is a big divide between 'patriotic' Republicans and RINOs.

There isn't. There isn't, at all.

Expand full comment

"...and don't think they wouldn't do it!"

I think they would do it. Yes, they would do it.

Expand full comment

They’re clever and sometimes diabolical, but the law of unintended consequences often intervenes. Re: the lawfare flop. That mess crash landed. More unintended consequences.

Expand full comment

Good point. The best laid plans of mice and Dems aft gang agley, as the poet said. The leftists seem to be better at getting power than at weilding control. They may well screw everything up, public policies and secret plots.

Expand full comment

They are a comedy of errors. In complete chaos. Or are they… 🤔

Expand full comment

IDK but my cynicisometer didn’t trigger too much reading that. They are out for their own games, and not the good of the country. Which is why they all need to be overthrown and close DC. Leave it for the jackals.

Expand full comment

I would tend to agree, but I hold out hope for MAGA, as a movement that could supercede Trump the individual. But maybe I am being naive or deluded. I may need to set my cynicsometer on the highest level.

Expand full comment

I’m also in the “hold out hope” camp. To believe that all sides of the political divide are really all working for the globalist team toward the destruction of everything we hold dear, is just a bridge too far for me. I still have a little more faith in humanity than to believe everyone with any political power is “in on it”; otherwise, you might as well go back to bed and pull the covers over your head because there is nothing you or anyone else can do about it, so you might as well accept your fate. I’m sure that is what they’d like us to believe because people with no hope are not going to fight, but I can’t allow myself to be that fatalistic. Eventually good is going to conquer evil, the only question is how long is that going to take and how rough is the ride going to be before we get there.

Expand full comment

"... I still have a little more faith in humanity than to believe everyone with any political power is 'in on it'..."

Yes. I think about this a lot. And I agree with you. My guesstimate as of this writing is that essentially all leftists are in on it and about half the rightist in power are in on it. That means that the good people are outnumbered 3 to 1. No wonder we seem to be losing.

Expand full comment

Here’s the thing:

1) “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy” (Jesus, cited in John 10:10).

2) The Left is going to attempt to do these things no matter who is President.

3) The RIGHTeous have a war to fight against wickedness.

4) We will win if we fight with the weapons of truth.

Expand full comment

Some of us have been saying this since 2020. We’re conspiracy theorists, though, so we’re censored and instead people walk around talking about fake wars, fake indictments, and fake elections as if they’re all real because they’re on TV and social media influencers are retarded.

Expand full comment

Nowadays, the so-called left is notoriously ham-fisted and impotent at political strategy. Everything they do comes up short: Hillary’s coronation. Trump’s impeachments. Enshrining abortion mills. Gender inversion as accepted social policy. Ukraine. The fizzled BLM revolution. Jan. 6. Eternal Covid boosters. On and on.

According to a thesis known as The 4th Turning, America is on the threshold of a glorious Golden Age. Read the book before you dispute it. THATS what’s going to happen under a Trump administration; the quantum OPPOSITE of what they’re hoping-against hope for.

Expand full comment

I read the blurb for _The Fourth Turning_ and I could not get past "Then comes an Unraveling, in which individualism triumphs over crumbling institutions. Last comes a Crisis—the Fourth Turning". When did individualism cause our institutions to crumble? I missed that era.

Your point is right though: The leftist are knaves, but also fools. It seems that they are good at getting control of governments and institutions, but fail to control them effectively. Their failure could give us the opportunity to take back our institutions and our country, if they don't literally destroy it first.

Expand full comment

There is no cause/effect at work. The cycles are scripted programming. We exist in a simulation; a mathematically encoded containment field construct. Quantum physics has detected it. But, that’s a whole nother kettle of different colored horses…

Expand full comment

I know they are up something evil , what ever their evil sick minds can come up with.

Expand full comment

All it would take is for the billionaire globalists to sell off their market shares at the same time. Fasten your seatbelts, friends!

Expand full comment

Excellent point. It doesn't take much to trigger a market crash. Historically, economists argue over what actually caused most of them.

Expand full comment

I didn’t realize it until I saw Soros buy a crap-ton of Peleton stock during the pandemic. Then everything clicked. 💡

Expand full comment

Or for China to call for repayment of our debt.

Expand full comment

That would work!

Expand full comment

As they are taking Taiwan.

Expand full comment

I have fought against losing hope these past 3+ years with Biden and Company —- and until reading this……I’ve kept my head (usually) above water —- but now? Now…I will have a great deal of trouble sleeping. Why? Because it is all so very plausible……and that, really frightens me for my family and my country.

Expand full comment

It's possible the Kamala Harris' nomination is evidence that Dems are NOT planning a Liz-Trump-style ambush of Trump. IMO we have lots of reasons to hope for a great future for

America. Overall, good tends to triumph over evil, or we wouldn't be here!

Chances are we will have opportunities to turn things around and begin to dismantle the deep state. We just have to seize those opportunities. Who thought Trump would win in 2016, and yet he did.

Expand full comment

This makes a lot of sense. It will be interesting to see how the events play out. There is always more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye.

Expand full comment

And add the assassination attempt on Trump, yesterday.

Orchestrated? Very certain.

How does that fit in?

Expand full comment

Convenient that the shooter was in the open enough to be shot and killed by the SS, but not until after he had taken shots. So like Oswald, he will not live to testify.

It was a good attempt; it actually should have worked. Would have if Trump had not turned his head, I guess. Trump has said, we are their real target. He is just in their way. It looks like we should presume the worst about our enemies' intentions?

Expand full comment

The shooter didn’t have any tactical skills, he was operating on emotions and adrenaline. CIA? I don’t think so. A DEI (token Caucasian) hire by Pelosi, possibly.

Expand full comment

If he was a leftist, it's probable that we won't ever get much info about him. Allegedly trans school-shooter Audrey Hale’s manifesto is still being suppressed and may never be made public.

(And thanks for you comments, Raul; I will be using them in a piece I plan to stack tomorrow morning.)

Expand full comment

How can a piece that calls the rightful prosecution of President Nixon’s machinations around Watergate a “leftist coup” be taken seriously?

Can a duly elected officeholder not still be held accountable for his actions ?

Expand full comment

My point is: How often are presidents held accountable for their actions? I could name at the very least two or three things Clinton did that were worse than the Watergate break in, but he finished two terms in office. Have you ever read how blatantly FDR misused the IRS to ruin his political opponents. Obviously, I could go on.

Nixon was a crook, but how many modern presidents weren't?

That the left succeeded in removing him from office over a minor thing, compared to what some other Republican and Democrats did, and probably to other things Nixon did, was a singular achievement. And one that they seek to repeat with Trump.

Expand full comment

The legal system serves political ends, obviously. That’s why politics is lousy with LAWYERS. Have you noticed?

Expand full comment

Makes a lot of sense. Would also explain Trudeau hanging on to the leadership of the Canadian Liberal Party despite his abyssal approval rate

Expand full comment