Well, I think it's time to go a lot further and say, clearly, this:
*The concept of a "virus" was a mistake at the get-go.
*The "virus" myth was foisted on the People in order to create wealth for a few
*The idea of vaccination is wrong on its face
*The scandal of "Covid" isn't how it was handled, it is that it is a FRAUD, on its face
*The entire event of "Covid" was a FRAUD, a global fraud, and all of this was avoidable, because it was a PLANNED GENOCIDE, ongoing.
*There are soooo many lies and false paradigms within the superstructure of our "health care" system, our governmental systems, our capitalism systems, our undoing of public health and well-being, our educational system, our land/resources/food supply, our judicial system, our general economic system.... and so and so on. Our entire existence has been co-opted and mismanaged by The Powers That Shouldn't Be.
The QUESTION, in my view, is how to go about FIXING all this? Where do we begin? I'd say that should be a multi-pronged weapon, maybe like a PITCHFORK.
We outnumber the Bad Guys by the BILLIONS. We don't even have to use VIOLENCE. So I think starting with those things that have to do with our existence-- food, and clean healthy food, clean water, clean air, the sources of attacks on us that endanger our lives/health, such as EMF's... Start with those, and then we can begin to sort out the rest... governments, laws, war machines, etc. Soldiers can be verry effective in various ways besides killing people. POSITIVE ACTION. I don't think violence is even necessary. But strong, healthy leadership surely is.
Thanks for mentioning my piece in your Substack, WH.
"Our entire existence has been co-opted and mismanaged by The Powers That Shouldn't Be.
The QUESTION, in my view, is how to go about FIXING all this?" I agree. And it's getting worse. IMO we have a short time before America goes over the cliff into an irreversible dive toward full totalitarianism. I don't think that's alarmism. It's what's happening.
The upside of COVID is that it opened a lot of people's eyes to the malevolence and massive overreach of government. I agree with you that change has to come from the ground up. Maybe the emergence of a grassroots movement like the Canadian Truckers' protest, but on a larger scale could turn the direction of our society around. But something has to be done to change the course of our nation, because we are in danger of losing everything that is good and right.
We can all do what we can do. Whatever we WANT to do... Some small thing, if we all do something, these small things add up, catch on. We CAN change our world, for the better, to something GREAT. It will take time, but... having FUN is CONTAGIOUS... ;)
And no problem sharing your posts, or whatever, my friend. I'm HAPPY to do that! Cheers!
To what degree have rulers always been above the law? Look at human history. At least a king would say out loud that he is above the law. Whereas our contemporary elites pretend that they are our equals (whilst also lecturing us at the same time).
Good point. I have recently realized that the question "To what degree have rulers always been above the law?" is more complex than I thought. I have been reading Kingship and Law in the Middle Ages by Fritz kern (suggested by circulation of the elites substack). It's fascinating. Turns out the ways and degree to which kings were answerable to the people is much more complex and interesting than I had imagined.
Yes, the Medieval kings would say that they were above the edicts that they issued, but the reality was more complicated. For example, that they ruled by divine right indeed put them above humans, they claimed, but that made them subject to the laws of god, which also were the rules believed in by the common people.
Exactly. If a tyrant was very unpopular, the aristocracy would usually replace him with a better king. This is how Richard II was replaced by Henry Bolingbroke, the Duke of Lancaster (aka King Henry IV).
Also, feudalism was often a complex web of reciprocal obligations and duties. The lord had obligations, rights, duties, to the king, and the king had responsibilities in turn. The subjects owed allegiance to the lord, while the lord had responsibilities to his tenants.
Egalitarianism usually erases all this, creating an environment devoid of accountability.
There really should be not emergency powers. Everything the government would actually need to do in a crisis should be backed into normal procedure. If your normal procedure genuinely need to be suspended during an emergency, then something is wrong with your procedures.
Well, I think it's time to go a lot further and say, clearly, this:
*The concept of a "virus" was a mistake at the get-go.
*The "virus" myth was foisted on the People in order to create wealth for a few
*The idea of vaccination is wrong on its face
*The scandal of "Covid" isn't how it was handled, it is that it is a FRAUD, on its face
*The entire event of "Covid" was a FRAUD, a global fraud, and all of this was avoidable, because it was a PLANNED GENOCIDE, ongoing.
*There are soooo many lies and false paradigms within the superstructure of our "health care" system, our governmental systems, our capitalism systems, our undoing of public health and well-being, our educational system, our land/resources/food supply, our judicial system, our general economic system.... and so and so on. Our entire existence has been co-opted and mismanaged by The Powers That Shouldn't Be.
The QUESTION, in my view, is how to go about FIXING all this? Where do we begin? I'd say that should be a multi-pronged weapon, maybe like a PITCHFORK.
We outnumber the Bad Guys by the BILLIONS. We don't even have to use VIOLENCE. So I think starting with those things that have to do with our existence-- food, and clean healthy food, clean water, clean air, the sources of attacks on us that endanger our lives/health, such as EMF's... Start with those, and then we can begin to sort out the rest... governments, laws, war machines, etc. Soldiers can be verry effective in various ways besides killing people. POSITIVE ACTION. I don't think violence is even necessary. But strong, healthy leadership surely is.
Thanks for mentioning my piece in your Substack, WH.
"Our entire existence has been co-opted and mismanaged by The Powers That Shouldn't Be.
The QUESTION, in my view, is how to go about FIXING all this?" I agree. And it's getting worse. IMO we have a short time before America goes over the cliff into an irreversible dive toward full totalitarianism. I don't think that's alarmism. It's what's happening.
The upside of COVID is that it opened a lot of people's eyes to the malevolence and massive overreach of government. I agree with you that change has to come from the ground up. Maybe the emergence of a grassroots movement like the Canadian Truckers' protest, but on a larger scale could turn the direction of our society around. But something has to be done to change the course of our nation, because we are in danger of losing everything that is good and right.
We can all do what we can do. Whatever we WANT to do... Some small thing, if we all do something, these small things add up, catch on. We CAN change our world, for the better, to something GREAT. It will take time, but... having FUN is CONTAGIOUS... ;)
And no problem sharing your posts, or whatever, my friend. I'm HAPPY to do that! Cheers!
To what degree have rulers always been above the law? Look at human history. At least a king would say out loud that he is above the law. Whereas our contemporary elites pretend that they are our equals (whilst also lecturing us at the same time).
Good point. I have recently realized that the question "To what degree have rulers always been above the law?" is more complex than I thought. I have been reading Kingship and Law in the Middle Ages by Fritz kern (suggested by circulation of the elites substack). It's fascinating. Turns out the ways and degree to which kings were answerable to the people is much more complex and interesting than I had imagined.
Yes, the Medieval kings would say that they were above the edicts that they issued, but the reality was more complicated. For example, that they ruled by divine right indeed put them above humans, they claimed, but that made them subject to the laws of god, which also were the rules believed in by the common people.
Exactly. If a tyrant was very unpopular, the aristocracy would usually replace him with a better king. This is how Richard II was replaced by Henry Bolingbroke, the Duke of Lancaster (aka King Henry IV).
Also, feudalism was often a complex web of reciprocal obligations and duties. The lord had obligations, rights, duties, to the king, and the king had responsibilities in turn. The subjects owed allegiance to the lord, while the lord had responsibilities to his tenants.
Egalitarianism usually erases all this, creating an environment devoid of accountability.
There really should be not emergency powers. Everything the government would actually need to do in a crisis should be backed into normal procedure. If your normal procedure genuinely need to be suspended during an emergency, then something is wrong with your procedures.
*baked
As for people breaking their oaths to the constitution, I think a lot has to do with our society not keeping any oaths or taking promises seriously.
I have opinions about IVF.