Another problem is that judges are entrusted with interpreting the law, so they are powerful. Judges have always been political, it is only a recent fad that has made them appear 'neutral'. Federal judges are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, so it does not help that the Senate is directly elected instead of being elected by the State legislatures. This means Senators care more for pleasing the people instead of honoring the States' rights.
Excellent point about the change in the Constitution to popularly elect Senators. It was a bad idea for the reason you state and others as well.
You know more about the history of judges and prosecutors than I do. Why do you say that they have always been political? Do you mean relatively recently or in ancient times as well?
I am not sure "ancient times" thought of judges in the same way as we do; and they also did not think of politics in the same way as we do now. In fact, if you think about it, an absolute monarchy is the least political society.
Judges are political the same way a lawmaker or governor is. Just like how nowadays it is common for a lawmaker to run for governor or President, crisscrossing between the legislative and executive branches; it used to be very common for back and forth with the judicial and other branches.
John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the US, resigned in order to become the Governor of New York. Andrew Jackson was the head of Tennessee's Supreme Court before he became the President of the United States. Taft was the US President and later was appointed to be the Chief Justice of the US.
Thanks, I see now what you mean by "political". Did you see my reply to your note about talking? I think I have a problem with my email forwarding. I'm definitely not receiving all the emails from Substack. I would like to communicate, if you want to talk to me please use issueninja@gmail.com. It should work.
Hello Anon, Are you new. That happened March 1861.
It was the benevolent Martial law of the industrial / military complex; E.O 100 the Lieber Code 1861 as Juxtaposed to the de facto, Malevolent martial law of big pharma WEF UN 2023 as juxtaposed to a non de facto Actual de jure Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. You must do it yourself, no one can do it for you, we cannot do it alone. A solution is found at www.orsja.org
It all plots on the bell curve. 62.5% will not say the truth to the de facto. Yes sir; no sir ! 3 bags full Sir. on the left, 12 to 15% are too stupid to qualify to join the military. 16.25% on the right are smart enough to figure it out but will not take action; 3 to 5% on the left control the stupid et al. evil and those that acquiesce to evil ; On the right 3 to 5% of us will return all of us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. A solution that works is published at www.orsja.org. Very few will go Athens, Tennessee 1946. The de facto yields to the de jure when the fraud of deception is clear. The occupant of the office will take a proper oath to the de jure Constitutions with God included no exceptions.
I had forgotten that the Battle of Athens, Tennessee happened in 1946, the same year that Congress de facto repealed Article 1 Section 1 of the Constitution. And Lincoln did de facto repeal most of the Constitution, or what remained of it. But passing the APA was a real repeal of Article 1 Section 1. It OFFICIALLY gave legislative powers to unelected government regulators.
Hope you are right that we will return to a representative form of government this year. But I will not be holding my breath.
Another problem is that judges are entrusted with interpreting the law, so they are powerful. Judges have always been political, it is only a recent fad that has made them appear 'neutral'. Federal judges are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, so it does not help that the Senate is directly elected instead of being elected by the State legislatures. This means Senators care more for pleasing the people instead of honoring the States' rights.
Excellent point about the change in the Constitution to popularly elect Senators. It was a bad idea for the reason you state and others as well.
You know more about the history of judges and prosecutors than I do. Why do you say that they have always been political? Do you mean relatively recently or in ancient times as well?
I am not sure "ancient times" thought of judges in the same way as we do; and they also did not think of politics in the same way as we do now. In fact, if you think about it, an absolute monarchy is the least political society.
Judges are political the same way a lawmaker or governor is. Just like how nowadays it is common for a lawmaker to run for governor or President, crisscrossing between the legislative and executive branches; it used to be very common for back and forth with the judicial and other branches.
John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the US, resigned in order to become the Governor of New York. Andrew Jackson was the head of Tennessee's Supreme Court before he became the President of the United States. Taft was the US President and later was appointed to be the Chief Justice of the US.
There are many such cases in the historic record.
Thanks, I see now what you mean by "political". Did you see my reply to your note about talking? I think I have a problem with my email forwarding. I'm definitely not receiving all the emails from Substack. I would like to communicate, if you want to talk to me please use issueninja@gmail.com. It should work.
Hello Anon, Are you new. That happened March 1861.
It was the benevolent Martial law of the industrial / military complex; E.O 100 the Lieber Code 1861 as Juxtaposed to the de facto, Malevolent martial law of big pharma WEF UN 2023 as juxtaposed to a non de facto Actual de jure Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. You must do it yourself, no one can do it for you, we cannot do it alone. A solution is found at www.orsja.org
It all plots on the bell curve. 62.5% will not say the truth to the de facto. Yes sir; no sir ! 3 bags full Sir. on the left, 12 to 15% are too stupid to qualify to join the military. 16.25% on the right are smart enough to figure it out but will not take action; 3 to 5% on the left control the stupid et al. evil and those that acquiesce to evil ; On the right 3 to 5% of us will return all of us to a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2024. A solution that works is published at www.orsja.org. Very few will go Athens, Tennessee 1946. The de facto yields to the de jure when the fraud of deception is clear. The occupant of the office will take a proper oath to the de jure Constitutions with God included no exceptions.
I had forgotten that the Battle of Athens, Tennessee happened in 1946, the same year that Congress de facto repealed Article 1 Section 1 of the Constitution. And Lincoln did de facto repeal most of the Constitution, or what remained of it. But passing the APA was a real repeal of Article 1 Section 1. It OFFICIALLY gave legislative powers to unelected government regulators.
Hope you are right that we will return to a representative form of government this year. But I will not be holding my breath.
Congress is color of law, without original jurisdiction, they cannot repeal anything. Why do you repeat that trash.
find or form you jural assembly.